I had heard somewhere that the probability of evolution having actually happened is greater than the number of atoms in the universe.
In my search for reliable back-up, I was 'shootin' the curl' in cyberspace and came across a British chap named Nigel Aldworth's
interesting web page which says in part,
"Ever wondered what the biggest number is in the history of science? Well, the estimate for the probability of our universe happening the way it did is 10 to the 200th power. Doesn't look that big does it? You only begin to grasp its size when they tell you that the total number of atoms in the universe is only 10 to the 80th. You get an idea of the size of these numbers if you consider that there are about a million atoms in a single grain of table salt, let alone the whole universe."It ends with
"The ultimate triumph of human reason will be to discover a Theory of Everything which will answer the question of why it is that we and the universe exist."The problem is, Nigel, that
human reason won't cut it!
Romans 11:33
O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments, and His ways past finding out!I also found a forum at another site, where a brave creationist started a conversation thread with the following question:
What is the probability of 124 specifically sequenced proteins, consisting of 400 all L-amino acids each, forming by chance, given every molecule in every ocean of 10 to the 31st power "Earths" being an amino acid, and these linking up in sets of 124 proteins every second for 10 billion years? 1 in 10 to the 78,436th power, so...probably not. -
bereanSome of the responses (I've taken the liberty of bowdlerizing the language to make it suitable for
younger or more sensitive readers):
"See here's the thing, genetics doesn't work in the same way that you flip a coin. There are variables and mutations. It's not just heads or tails." -
sucksathalo"So, where do you believe the dinosaurs are hiding today?" -
leobaby"Evolution isn't meant to explain the origins of life, it's the theory that life evolves..." -
dracula7"What a crock of [boogers]. These fundie moron's[sic] know just enough to be dangerous, yet are experts at twisting everything to their cause. Just drink the koolaid already and let the rest of us logical thinking people carry on." -
vonskippy"Can people please stop trying to pass off theology as science? If any of these "scientific studies" were scientific in any way, they would have been published in peer-reviewed journals. As it is, I have yet to see any work from the "Answers in Genesis" crowd to make it through the review process. This isn't because of some Darwin-lovers circling the wagons, either. It's because these "studies" don't pass any of the requisite criteria for being considered science, such as impartial data analysis and falsifiable hypotheses." -
physicsguy23"Even if that probability is right you got 4 billion years to sort it out." -
10scott10"Scientific folk are interested in how life began, religious folk are interested in why life began... but for the record, if the odds of Evolution happening are 1 in 10 to the 78,436th, then the odds of there being a god who created us must be like 1 in 10 to the 4,815,162,342,108th. Of course I don't have all the [fancy] paperwork to back that statistic up." -
evari"Um, isn't this the science section? Hello? Telling me god designed everything and the earth is 6000 years old is not science. If you want to believe in creationism go live in a cave somewhere and don't use the internet." -
Punkymonkeyberean is a man after my own heart - he uses logic and their own numbers against them.
What puzzles me is...why are they so hostile and passionate? They have an unshakable faith based on...
what?! If everything is the result of random chance, why get worked up about what religious whackos think? It doesn't really matter, does it? Or are de-sensitized nerves being struck, as if with a ballpeen hammer? If folks like
vonskippy are "logical thinking people", where does logic or the ability to think come from?
In the words of Jonathan Swift:
There is none so blind as they that won't see.